11d
@carnivorum saidI gotta see this debate.
Duons, that is dual coding genes, prove beyond any doubt intelligent design, and with that an Intelligent Designer.
For the finer details look here: https://tinyurl.com/God-won
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116993
@carnivorum saidOh dear.
Duons, that is dual coding genes, prove beyond any doubt intelligent design, and with that an Intelligent Designer.
For the finer details look here: https://tinyurl.com/God-won
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2013/12/13/dont-be-duped-by-duon-dna-hype/
11d
@divegeester saidAccording to my humble opinion, that article says totally nothing.
Oh dear.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2013/12/13/dont-be-duped-by-duon-dna-hype/
Not a word about how the dual coding came into existence, nothing.
What do you want to say with that article?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116993
@carnivorum saidThe page you posted is just a religious propaganda page from a creationist echo-chamber. The Forbes page debunks it.
According to my humble opinion, that article says totally nothing.
Not a word about how the dual coding came into existence, nothing.
What do you want to say with that article?
I believe in creation and I’m not embarrassed by that belief; but even though I believe in creation I try not to embarrass myself by posting links to unscientific gish-gallop webpages in piss-poor attempts to prove it.
11d
@carnivorum said
Duons, that is dual coding genes, prove beyond any doubt intelligent design, and with that an Intelligent Designer.
For the finer details look here: https://tinyurl.com/God-won
The anthropic principle proves that the creation of the universe cannot have been accidental
Second sentence on the page and already it is quite clear that we won't see anything tht could be aceepted as "prof" for anybody not subscribing to the original theis anyway.
11d
@divegeester saidThe Forbes page doesn't go at all into how the duons might have come into being without intelligent design, so it doesn't debunk anything.
The page you posted is just a religious propaganda page from a creationist echo-chamber. The Forbes page debunks it.
I believe in creation and I’m not embarrassed by that belief; but even though I believe in creation I try not to embarrass myself by posting links to unscientific gish-gallop webpages in piss-poor attempts to prove it.
The only thing that page does is whining about something else.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116993
11d
@carnivorum saidThe Forbes page gives and headline summary of why you claims that “God did it” are unsubstantiated nonsense.
The Forbes page doesn't go at all into how the duons might have come into being without intelligent design, so it doesn't debunk anything.
Any lack of a scientific explanation for anything anywhere anytime does not automatically mean “God did it”.
And yes the page you linked just waffles on about “God did it” while posting 5 other links to other religious echo-chamber webpages which also say “God did it”. Nothing more.
Stop trolling, or grow up.
11d
@divegeester saidSo we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
The Forbes page gives and headline summary of why you claims that “God did it” are unsubstantiated nonsense.
Any lack of a scientific explanation for anything anywhere anytime does not automatically mean “God did it”.
And yes the page you linked just waffles on about “God did it” while posting 5 other links to other religious echo-chamber webpages which also say “God did it”. Nothing more.
Stop trolling, or grow up.
So it should be clear to everybody that the only rational explanation is intelligent design.
And there we have our Intelligent Designer.
We call Him "God".
It is really that simple.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116993
11d
@carnivorum saidNo we don’t agree.
So we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116993
11d
@carnivorum saidYou’re either stupid or trolling.
So we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
So it should be clear to everybody that the only rational explanation is intelligent design.
And there we have our Intelligent Designer.
We call Him "God".
It is really that simple.
10d
@carnivorum saidGap identified.
So we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
So it should be clear to everybody that the only rational explanation is intelligent design.
And there we have our Intelligent Designer.
We call Him "God".
It is really that simple.
God of the Gaps to the rescue.
@carnivorum saidIt is really that simple.
So we agree that there is no scientific explanation what so ever for the existence of duons.
So it should be clear to everybody that the only rational explanation is intelligent design.
And there we have our Intelligent Designer.
We call Him "God".
It is really that simple.
Only to the simple-minded.
Just because we don't currently have an explanation for something, it does not follow that the only possible explanation is "God did it," and even if it did, it still would not follow that the 'god' who did it is identical with Yahweh much less that Yahweh is identical with an obstreperous Jew who got himself crucified in the Levant about 2,000 years ago. There isn't merely a gap in your reasoning; it's chasm wide enough for the USS Eisenhower carrier strike group to reverse course in.
10d
@divegeester saidNone of your business.
Did you read any of the webpage posted in the OP?
Did you read any of the 5 links within webpage?
Have you done any reading on the subject other than from Creation.com?
None of your business.
None of your business.