Could the number of thumbs up/thumbs down given by each member be recorded at their profile. Then the person with the most could win a prize, like a life time subscription. This could also deter negative nellies like suziman (name disguised) from smashing the dislike button out of vindictive, malicious spite.
We'd see a ratio e.g. say 80% positive to 20% negative, this would say something about this members character, we'd say 'Here's a happy go lucky guy, good day to you sir' or if we saw 80% negative to 20% positive we could say 'WTF is this bitc--s problem?'
@wajoma saidSo you (like a couple of other Forum Regulars), are looking to shame people.
Could the number of thumbs up/thumbs down given by each member be recorded at their profile. Then the person with the most could win a prize, like a life time subscription. This could also deter negative nellies like suziman (name disguised) from smashing the dislike button out of vindictive, malicious spite.
We'd see a ratio e.g. say 80% positive to 20% negative, this ...[text shortened]... ay to you sir' or if we saw 80% negative to 20% positive we could say 'WTF is this bitc--s problem?'
Sorry to burst your bubble, but people who red-thumb your posts simply disagree with your posts. It is not "spite", vindictive, malignant, or otherwise, which is you trying to minimize their disagreement.
@suzianne saidAh ha, I knew it was you, the serial thumbs downer. But this statement of yours, it's very revealing of the suzi-psyche, it's an admission of sorts, it's an admission of how ashamed you are of your own behavior, you don't like the light being shone, you scurry like a cockroach.
So you (like a couple of other Forum Regulars), are looking to shame people.
@wajoma saidSo, your answer is yes, you're driven by shaming others. Another answer to copious red thumbs is to simply post better. You do realize that option is open to you, yes?
Ah ha, I knew it was you, the serial thumbs downer. But this statement of yours, it's very revealing of the suzi-psyche, it's an admission of sorts, it's an admission of how ashamed you are of your own behavior, you don't like the light being shone, you scurry like a cockroach.
72d
@wajoma saidYou forgot the
Could the number of thumbs up/thumbs down given by each member be recorded at their profile. Then the person with the most could win a prize, like a life time subscription. This could also deter negative nellies like suziman (name disguised) from smashing the dislike button out of vindictive, malicious spite.
We'd see a ratio e.g. say 80% positive to 20% negative, this ...[text shortened]... ay to you sir' or if we saw 80% negative to 20% positive we could say 'WTF is this bitc--s problem?'
[sarcasm] flag...
72d
@ponderable saidcovfefe
You forgot the
[sarcasm] flag...
It appears to have been deactivated in his profile.
😆
@wajoma saidAwww, another delicate ego who can’t take negative feedback. I’m sure there’s a FaceBook groupthink group for you where you’ll get only positive replies.
Could the number of thumbs up/thumbs down given by each member be recorded at their profile. Then the person with the most could win a prize, like a life time subscription. This could also deter negative nellies like suziman (name disguised) from smashing the dislike button out of vindictive, malicious spite.
We'd see a ratio e.g. say 80% positive to 20% negative, this ...[text shortened]... ay to you sir' or if we saw 80% negative to 20% positive we could say 'WTF is this bitc--s problem?'
😲
71d
@wajoma saidThread 196081
Could the number of thumbs up/thumbs down given by each member be recorded at their profile. Then the person with the most could win a prize, like a life time subscription. This could also deter negative nellies like suziman (name disguised) from smashing the dislike button out of vindictive, malicious spite.
We'd see a ratio e.g. say 80% positive to 20% negative, this ...[text shortened]... ay to you sir' or if we saw 80% negative to 20% positive we could say 'WTF is this bitc--s problem?'
The feature should be for subscribers only.
@moonbus saidHaha, no, it was bait for those that think anonymous internet points mean something. I've been doing this far too long. But if you were to attach some importance to fake internet points, getting thumbs down is wayyyy better than getting nothing at all.
Awww, another delicate ego who can’t take negative feedback. I’m sure there’s a FaceBook groupthink group for you where you’ll get only positive replies.
😲
Know anything about that? You know, like being ignored? You know what it's like to be unseen?
I threw the bait out and hooked a bunch. ;^)
55d
@wajoma saidAre you and @metal-brain the same user? Your logic is as bad as his.
Haha, no, it was bait for those that think anonymous internet points mean something. I've been doing this far too long. But if you were to attach some importance to fake internet points, getting thumbs down is wayyyy better than getting nothing at all.
Know anything about that? You know, like being ignored? You know what it's like to be unseen?
I threw the bait out and hooked a bunch. ;^)
